Skip to main content

Centre for Inquiry CARL SAGAN T-shirts now available

You can go to an on-line store here. We are not making any profit on these - but if you want to donate a couple of quid, go to www.cfiuk.org and hit the "Support CFI UK" button.

The Sagan picture shirts are on white or light colour only. Otherwise choose any colour you want. Hit the shirt to get the colour options.

I might pull the picture shirts shortly, depending on copyright issues, so if you want one get in right now!

These T-shirts are all Carl Sagan themed. Later, if I feel inspired, I may do e.g. a twee "Russell's Teapot" and an all-action "Bullshit Force!" (perhaps based on the A-Team, only with Russell, Sagan, Dawkins, and Randi as Mr T) version.

Comments

Jac said…
The link isn't working for me. I like the Russle's Teapot shirt idea.
Stephen Law said…
Link stopped working but is working again now I think, Jackie.

Will sort out Russell's teapot.
Kyle Szklenski said…
Um, does this mean we American's cannot order the t-shirts? I tried, and there's no "U.S." option for the address country.

If anyone would like to buy us a few shirts and send them, we'd pay good money for them. :) We'd need a woman's small, man's large, and man's medium.
Stephen Law said…
I'll post you some. Give me bit to sort out how. Maybe you could pay me via paypal?

The other thing is - I can send you the image and you can just whip up your own versions at an equivalent US site, of which I'm sure there are many.
Kyle Szklenski said…
I could pay via Paypal fairly easily. My Jackie says she might rather wait for Russell's Teapot, though. I rather like that one, too. Yeah, maybe we'll just wait. Thanks though!
Anonymous said…
There seems to be a typo on the long sleeved shirt - you might want to check it. (applie pie)?
Stephen Law said…
I have put up a Russell's teapot. But perhaps not to Jackie's taste? let me know.

I could do one with Russell's face in the teapot, or bigger teapot, or ....
Stephen Law said…
There are badges and mugs too, now. I don't suppose we'll sell many - or perhaps any. But fun designing them.

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen

Why I won't be voting Labour at the next General Election, not even to 'keep the Tories out'.

I have always voted Labour, and have often been a member of the Party, campaigning and canvassing for them. For what it’s worth, here’s my feeling about voting Labour next General Election:   1. When the left vote Labour after they move rightwards, they are encouraged to just move further right, to the point where they are now probably right of where e.g. John Major’s Tory party was. And each time the Tories go further right still. At some point we have got to stop fuelling this toxic drift to the right by making the Labour Party realise that it’s going to start costing them votes. I can’t think of anything politically more important than halting this increasingly frightening rightward slide. So I am no longer voting Labour. 2. If a new socialist party starts up, it could easily hoover up many of the 200k former LP members who have left in disgust (I’d join), and perhaps also pick up union affiliations. They could become the second biggest party by membership quite quickly. Our voting

Aquinas on homosexuality

Thought I would try a bit of a draft out on the blog, for feedback. All comments gratefully received. No doubt I've got at least some details wrong re the Catholic Church's position... AQUINAS AND SEXUAL ETHICS Aquinas’s thinking remains hugely influential within the Catholic Church. In particular, his ideas concerning sexual ethics still heavily shape Church teaching. It is on these ideas that we focus here. In particular, I will look at Aquinas’s justification for morally condemning homosexual acts. When homosexuality is judged to be morally wrong, the justification offered is often that homosexuality is, in some sense, “unnatural”. Aquinas develops a sophisticated version of this sort of argument. The roots of the argument lie in thinking of Aristotle, whom Aquinas believes to be scientifically authoritative. Indeed, one of Aquinas’s over-arching aims was to show how Aristotle’s philosophical system is broadly compatible with Christian thought. I begin with a sketch of Arist